From quinn@fazigu.org Sat Jun 21 12:03:46 2003 Return-path: Envelope-to: quinn@localhost Received: from requiem ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=quinn) by requiem with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19TkqA-0003Sp-00 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:03:46 -0400 Delivered-To: quinn@netsville.com Received: from requiem [127.0.0.1] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.1) for quinn@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:03:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx61.postini.com [12.158.34.174]) by corpmail.netsville.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CA01D4BA8E for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:13:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from source ([66.100.236.130]) by exprod5mx61.postini.com ([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 09:13:03 PDT Received: (qmail 882 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2003 16:14:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO moo.ghostmoo.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2003 16:14:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:14:10 -0400 From: "Quinn@Ghostwheel" To: quinn@netsville.com Subject: Ghostwheel Message(s) 1984 from *ideas (#504) X-Mail-Agent: Ghostwheel (moo.ghostmoo.org 6969) X-pstn-levels: (C:79.6536 M:99.4056 P:95.9108 R:95.9108 S: 6.8544 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.0000:2.0000) pmCr X-pstn-addresses: from Message-Id: <20030621161303.CA01D4BA8E@corpmail.netsville.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 548 Lines: 16 Message 1984 from *ideas (#504): Date: Sat May 3 21:46:45 2003 CDT From: Elendil (#2237) To: *ideas (#504) Does the 'dodge' verb need to be updated? While 'dodge ' works, the dodge itself seems no different from a regular dodge check. It's almost as if the bonus it applies stems from so long ago that it's tiny and has no effect under the current combat system. Put another way, there doesn't seem to be any point to using this verb on someone since you don't seem to get a bonus. --------------------------