From quinn@fazigu.org Mon Feb 16 13:38:37 2004
Return-path: <quinn@fazigu.org>
Envelope-to: quinn@localhost
Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:38:37 -0500
Received: from requiem
	([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=quinn)
	by requiem with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Asndc-0002Pr-01
	for <quinn@localhost>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:38:36 -0500
X-Original-To: quinn@netsville.com
Delivered-To: quinn@netsville.com
Received: from requiem [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.4)
	for quinn@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:38:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx85.postini.com [12.158.34.73])
	by corpmail.netsville.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 28FE14BAF4
	for <quinn@netsville.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:41:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from source ([66.100.236.130]) by exprod5mx85.postini.com ([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP;
	Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:41:35 PST
Received: (qmail 9512 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 18:58:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO moo.ghostmoo.org) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 18:58:12 -0000
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:58:12 -0400
From: "Quinn@Ghostwheel" <ghost@moo.ghostmoo.org>
To: quinn@netsville.com
Subject: Ghostwheel Message(s) 1 - 5 from *Bugs (#1294)
X-Mail-Agent: Ghostwheel (moo.ghostmoo.org 6969)
Message-Id: <20040216184136.28FE14BAF4@corpmail.netsville.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on requiem
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.63
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1365
Lines: 60

Message 1 from *Bugs (#1294):
Date:     Mon Dec 29 22:01:23 2003 CST
From:     Red_Fang (#5907)
To:       *Bugs (#1294)
Subject:  Armed

Think something is wrong with Armed, I'm like way over average and it is
acting like it is below average and giving strange times on the boostometer..

--------------------------


Message 2 from *Bugs (#1294):
Date:     Tue Dec 30 02:47:34 2003 CST
From:     Nny (#25135)
To:       *Bugs (#1294)

I think that would be a result of a bunch of people having obscene armeds.
Maybe that *is* the average now.

--------------------------


Message 3 from *Bugs (#1294):
Date:     Tue Dec 30 13:22:42 2003 CST
From:     Red_Fang (#5907)
To:       *Bugs (#1294)
Subject:  re: Armed

I am very very sure I am way over average on Armed.  The boostometer tells me
it will boost in 2 hours 15 minutes normally.  Last night for some reason it
was not setting its timer right.  I logged it best I could if anyone would
like to see that.

Red.

--------------------------


Message 4 from *Bugs (#1294):
Date:     Tue Dec 30 15:44:14 2003 CST
From:     Nny (#25135)
To:       *Bugs (#1294)

the only explanation is machine elves.

--------------------------


Message 5 from *Bugs (#1294):
Date:     Tue Dec 30 16:17:08 2003 CST
From:     Dante (#10660)
To:       *Bugs (#1294)
Subject:  Or.

Underpant gnomes.

--------------------------